Skip to main content

What one ecologist's high-flying studies reveal about our forests

[ad_1]

"Doing good conservation requires knowing what you’ve got, where it is, and how it’s doing.” —Greg Asner

"Doing good conservation requires knowing what you’ve got, where it is, and how it’s doing.” —Greg Asner (Photo by Steve Craft/)

On the Big Island of Hawaii, a fungus called ceratocystis is murdering ‘Ōhi‘a trees—at least 1 million in the past eight years. Local forest experts had no idea how to contain the quick-killing pathogen, until an aerial survey from ecologist Greg Asner revealed a pattern they could distinctly see only from above. At the edge of Hawaii ­Volcanoes National Park, fences drew a sharp line between dead trees and healthy ones. The barriers kept out feral pigs, which, they realized, would gash the trunks with their tusks, enabling the infection. If the scientists could bar the ungulates, the ‘Ōhi‘as might survive.

This type of insight from Asner, 51, has helped arboreal managers plot and maintain the health of forests for nearly a decade. “Doing good conservation requires knowing what you’ve got, where it is, and how it’s doing,” Asner says. His lab, aboard a twin-prop Dornier 228, produces maps that reveal the structure of the canopy, indicate how much carbon trees trap, and even estimate hydration to see how forests cope with drought. From his seat near the navigation console, 7,000 feet up, Asner directs the crew to capture swaths of land too large to take in from the ground and with greater detail than far-away satellites.

This career in the sky began at sea. A six-year tour as a deep-sea diver in the Navy in the late ’80s and early ’90s started his journey into ecology. “I saw a lot of cool environments that I didn’t know existed,” Asner recalls. His work above the surface began as a field tech with the Nature Conservancy in Hawaii, and eventually netted him a Ph.D. in biology in 1997, a seat on the faculty at the Carnegie Institution for Science, and one fancy airplane. Today, he’s airborne as the director of the Arizona State University Center for Global Discovery and Conservation Science.

His customized plane hauls more than 5,000 pounds of equipment, including cameras and racks of computers, but Asner's unique analyses rely most on two key sensor systems. The first is a pair of powerful 18-watt lasers that reflect off the trees to create a 3D view. The second is a set of high-fidelity spectrometers, which measure the light—from ultraviolet to ­infrared—​that the trees reflect. Chemicals in the leaves, such as chlorophyll and carbohydrates, create a spectral signature that indicates, among other metrics, the trees' hydration, health, and species. Artificial intelligence helps Asner's team interpret the data.

Over the past decade, his colorful surveys have illuminated forests in a dozen locations, including orangutan habitats in Borneo and lion hunting grounds in South Africa. Soaring over Peru in 2013 produced a map that encodes the country’s carbon stocks—the amount of the element its trees store. The research helped managers plan protected areas, which ensures a sufficient carbon sink and preserves a variety of species as a safeguard against a shifting climate. “A biodiverse ecosystem is much more resilient to change than one that’s made up of one species,” he says.

Closer to home, in the drought- and fire-prone American West, Asner’s most focused on hydration. Flights over California since 2015 tallied 120 million severely dry trees, of which at least 100 million are dead. In places like Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks, preserves rich with sequoias, ponderosa pines, and white firs, foresters could use his data to plan burns to thin out trees and relieve stress on the remaining ones. As a rapidly changing climate brings more-frequent droughts and other extreme weather, land managers increasingly will rely on Asner’s input to make these kinds of hard choices. “Some of that,” he says, “is what lives and what dies.”

This article was originally published in the Summer 2019 Make It Last issue of Popular Science.



[ad_2]

Written By Rob Verger

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...

With Operation Popeye, the U.S. government made weather an instrument of war

[ad_1] It was a seasonably chilly afternoon in 1974 when Senators Claiborne Pell, a Democrat from Rhode Island, and Clifford Case, a Republican from New Jersey, strode into the chambers of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for a classified briefing. While the meeting was labeled “top secret,” the topic at hand was rather mundane: They were there to discuss the weather. More specifically, Pell, the chairman of the now-defunct subcommittee for Oceans and International Environment, and his colleague were about to learn the true extent of a secret five-year-old cloud seeding operation meant to lengthen the monsoon season in Vietnam, destabilize the enemy, and allow the United States to win the war. Though it cycled through several names in its history, "Operation Popeye" stuck. Its stated objectives—to ensure Americans won the Vietnam War—were never realized, the revelation that the U.S. government played God with weather-altering warfare changed history. The...

The fate of future endangered species could hinge on a semantic argument

[ad_1] Everyone agrees that the Pacific walrus is stressed. The large, tusked pinnipeds depend on floating sea ice to rest and give birth in the spring and summers, when the Goldilocks-sized not-too-thin, not-too-thick ice floes they require are becoming increasingly rare. But coming to a consensus on how the large marine mammals will react to that stress is less straightforward. “While the Pacific walrus will experience a future reduction in availability of sea ice ... we are unable to reliably predict the magnitude of the effect,” read the official Fish and Wildlife service finding in October 2017, explaining the decision not to list the species under the Endangered Species Act despite the service’s own 2011 assessment that it was threatened by climate change. The text continued: “We do not have reliable information showing that the magnitude of this change could be sufficient to put the subspecies in danger of extinction now or in the foreseeable future....