Skip to main content

Mourning a fictional character is perfectly valid

[ad_1]


Fictional characters may not suffer when they die, but true fans certainly do.



Avengers fans have fallen on some hard times recently. Grey’s Anatomy fanatics still aren’t over McDreamy—or McSteamy, for that matter. Even Game of Thrones loyalists, who watch perhaps the most brutal show ever to air on television, struggle with the loss of, well, approximately 200 characters and counting.



The idea of mourning someone who doesn’t technically exist may seem anathema to more stoic consumers of film and television. But just because this particular type of grieving is “disenfranchised,” to use the parlance of grief counselors, doesn’t mean it’s illegitimate.


“You know what the hardest grief is? The grief you’re going through right now,” says Alan Wolfelt, founder of the Center for Loss and Life Transition. While there’s very little peer-reviewed research on people’s responses to the deaths of fictional characters, Wolfelt and his fellow grief counselors agree it’s a real, perhaps even common, occurrence. While the relationship between a character and a consumer is one-sided, it’s meant to be deeply felt.



Characters aren’t the only fictional thing worth mourning. People also experience loss when a TV series or film franchise ends—even if no one died on screen. In a 2013 paper in the Journal of Consumer Research, marketing experts studied people’s responses to the end of so-called “narrative brands,” which many follow along with for years, or even decades.



They found that people not only form relationships with their favorite characters, but with the real-life humans they watched the series alongside or went to all the movies with. Yvonne, a diehard fan of the 107-episode New Zealand family drama Outrageous Fortune, told the study authors, “[I]t's hard to let go of people you care about, it's like somebody that you loved died, or moving away.” Sopranos buff Marc, meanwhile, said “we all felt sad and more than a little lost.” Without the show, he and his friends “don't have that same shared interest you know—I miss that—I miss them.”


Like any other loss, it’s important for the person suffering to process their grief, and for others to validate it. These are the first two steps of what Wolfelt calls “grief work.” They can be difficult to execute in contemporary American culture, he says. We tend to recognize only a narrow kind of grief. Only losses within the nuclear family are seen as deserving of time off from work, for example, and we emphasize “moving on” and “processing” it as quickly as possible.



Once those two foundational things are in place, it’s time for productive reminiscing. “You’ll find you go backward before forward,” he says. In this case, it might be going back to the first episode, or watching blooper and highlight reels of your favorite characters. But the goal is to get to the next step: developing your identity without those characters in your life. While you can always take a trip down memory lane, the fifth step is about finding meaning in new ways. The sixth and final step is one worth repeating: maintain your support network, so that in weeks or months or years, you’ll have people to turn to in the midst of a “grief burst.”



The Harry Potter series might be a perfect template for the ups and downs of mourning. Though the series wrapped up 12 years ago, the online community—through Twitter and the fan experience site Pottermore and dedicated Reddit groups—lives on. This can be positive, Wolfelt says, allowing people to communicate with others who understand their sense of loss over the series’ end. But it’s also created a bit of a ruckus. The author of the universe, J.K. Rowling, has a penchant for sharing details outside the scope of the books, projecting her characters forward into the future, or digging deep into previously-unwritten accounts of their past. Even the most loyal fans have become frustrated by the unending updates and the sensation that things will never end, which Wolfelt calls a “complication of grief.” The British newspaper *The Guardian summed it up succinctly: “It’s time to say goodbye.”



So if you’re feeling a little lost after a show ended or your favorite character died, know it’s all part of the process. And if you’re not, you can still support others. “Whenever you say ‘just,’ you’re minimizing something for someone else,” Wolfelt says. “‘Well, it’s just a pet,’ or ‘it’s just a show’—you’re not creating space for them to be affirmed.” And everyone deserves a little space to grieve.




[ad_2]

Written By Eleanor Cummins

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Humans flourished through a supervolcano eruption 74,000 years ago (so you can make it through Tuesday)

[ad_1] About 74,000 years ago, a large chunk of a Pacific island exploded. It sent ash and other debris around the world, including to the southern tip of Africa, where it would be found by a team of international scientists and entered as the latest data point in one of the hottest debates in paleoanthropology ( I know ): Did the Toba supervolcano thrust our planet into a 1,000-year volcanic winter, thus bottle-necking animals and plants alike? Or was it just a little blip on our historic radar? That’s the contentious arena into which our intrepid researchers venture, this time with a new study in Nature establishing that humans in modern-day South Africa not only survived, but flourished after the Toba eruption. Where once was (we think, maybe) a mountain, there is now a huge caldera with a lake inside, and an island inside that. Their evidence shows that debris from the explosion landed 9,000 kilometers (5592.3 miles) away, the farthest distance traveled ever recorded for the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too unethical to repeat—even on monkeys.

[ad_1] John Gluck’s excitement about studying parent-child separation quickly soured. He’d been thrilled to arrive at the University of Wisconsin at Madison in the late 1960s, his spot in the lab of renowned behavioral psychologist Harry Harlow secure. Harlow had cemented his legacy more than a decade earlier when his experiments showed the devastating effects of broken parent-child bonds in rhesus monkeys. As a graduate student researcher, Gluck would use Harlow’s monkey colony to study the impact of such disruption on intellectual ability. Gluck found academic success, and stayed in touch with Harlow long after graduation. His mentor even sent Gluck monkeys to use in his own laboratory. But in the three years Gluck spent with Harlow—and the subsequent three decades he spent as a leading animal researcher in his own right—his concern for the well-being of his former test subjects overshadowed his enthusiasm for animal research. Separating parent and child,...
Post a Comment
Read more