Skip to main content

Here's why NASA really canceled its first all-women spacewalk

[ad_1]


The first-ever all-women spacewalk originally scheduled for Friday will no longer be all women. Late Monday afternoon, NASA announced a change in its spacewalk scheduling, revealing that astronaut Anne McClain would be replaced by Nick Hague for Friday’s operation.



Originally, McClain and Christina Koch were set to follow-up on an earlier spacewalk that took place March 22. They planned to continue work behind the installation of lithium-ion batteries for a pair of the International Space Station’s solar arrays. This would have been the first time a crew of only women conducted a spacewalk.



So what happened? NASA’s statement, along with comments given to Popular Science by a NASA spokesperson, noted that there were issues involved in the availability of spacesuits on the ISS. Spacesuits are reconfigurable in different ways, being that each is comprised of a top and a bottom. McClain had trained in both the medium and large torso parts, but learned during her March 22 spacewalk that she fits better in a medium-size torso. So does Koch.



And while there are actually two medium size spacesuit segments on the station, it’s much easier and faster to simply change out who’s going than reconfigure the entire spacesuit, especially if the agency is trying to avoid schedule delays that disrupt plans down the line. So NASA elected to have Koch wear the suit for the March 29 spacewalk (and move Hague into the open slot for that operation), and have McClain wear it on the spacewalk scheduled for April 8.



“We do our best to anticipate the spacesuit sizes that each astronaut will need, based on the spacesuit size they wore in training on the ground, and in some cases (including Anne’s) astronauts train in multiple sizes,” NASA spokesperson Brandi Dean told Popular Science. “However, individuals’ sizing needs may change when they are on orbit, in response to the changes living in microgravity can bring about in a body.” For instance, McClain herself tweeted earlier this month that the microgravity environment in orbit had caused her to grow two inches taller (a common occurrence, as the disks of fluid between human vertebrae expand without the crush of gravity).



“No one training environment can fully simulate performing a spacewalk in microgravity,” said Dean, “and an individual may find that their sizing preferences change in space.”



While it is encouraging to know that McClain and her fellow crew members are empowered to make decisions on their preferences for these operations, many have speculated that NASA’s decision was a symptom of flawed, biased logistics that hadn’t taken typical female sizes into account—hence there being only one medium-sized torso at-the-ready instead of two. Even Hillary Clinton has weighed in.


Gender bias is absolutely a systemic problem in space and every STEAM discipline, but it’s also important to note that in this particular instance, there are a lot of other factors at play—including the fact that NASA basically has a spacesuit crisis on its hands. Hugo Award-winning author Mary Robinette Kowal posted a very good tweet thread Tuesday afternoon emphasizing that the spacesuits, originally designed more than 40 years ago, were meant to have only a 15-year lifespan and be refurbished periodically to mitigate and repair wear and tear. Only four of the original 18 are aboard the ISS. “When NASA says there’s not one readily available, it’s sort of like...yeah. There’s one up there, but we aren’t sure it won’t leak,” Kowal wrote.



To that end, it makes sense that the agency would just move Hague into Friday’s spacewalk and have McClain slotted for the following week—safety and comfort are of the utmost priority. It’s already hell to put on a space suit and venture out into a cold empty vacuum hundreds of miles above Earth. A suit with the snuggest possible fit gives you more control of your own movements, as well as the ability to properly interface with some of the suit controls. If we had more spacesuits, and ones in smaller sizes, it’s possible all of this could have been avoided. And if NASA had been more inclusive toward women since its inception, perhaps we would have had them. Kowal’s Twitter thread noted that when NASA nixed its small and XL suit sizes due to budget cuts, “many of the male astronauts could not fit into the L suits, so the XLs were brought back.” But the smallest suits weren’t.



Monday’s schedule change is not any one person’s fault. But the disappointing turn of events reinforces how long the effects of past decisions can last. NASA and the space community at large are making inclusivity of women a bigger priority than ever, but in many ways, we’re still trying to undo biases taken for granted decades ago.



[ad_2]

Written By Neel V. Patel

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...

With Operation Popeye, the U.S. government made weather an instrument of war

[ad_1] It was a seasonably chilly afternoon in 1974 when Senators Claiborne Pell, a Democrat from Rhode Island, and Clifford Case, a Republican from New Jersey, strode into the chambers of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for a classified briefing. While the meeting was labeled “top secret,” the topic at hand was rather mundane: They were there to discuss the weather. More specifically, Pell, the chairman of the now-defunct subcommittee for Oceans and International Environment, and his colleague were about to learn the true extent of a secret five-year-old cloud seeding operation meant to lengthen the monsoon season in Vietnam, destabilize the enemy, and allow the United States to win the war. Though it cycled through several names in its history, "Operation Popeye" stuck. Its stated objectives—to ensure Americans won the Vietnam War—were never realized, the revelation that the U.S. government played God with weather-altering warfare changed history. The...

University supercomputers are science's unsung heroes, and Texas will get the fastest yet

[ad_1] Supercomputers are powerful machines with great names—Blue Waters, Bridges, Jetstream, Comet. But a new one will soon be joining that list: Frontera. The $60 million machine will live at the University of Texas at Austin and is scheduled to come online next year. “It will be the fastest machine ever deployed at a university in the US,” says Dan Stanzione, the executive director of the Texas Advanced Computing Center. With supercomputers, the title of fastest is a moving target—what’s perhaps more important is not the exact ranking, but that they’re available for researchers to use in the first place. Right now, the fastest supercomputer in the world is called Summit, and it’s at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, part of the Department of Energy (DOE), and is specifically tailored for AI. But supercomputers located not at government labs but at universities—like Frontera and its ilk—play a crucial role in the ever...