Skip to main content

Before self-driving cars can get safer, they need to push their limits

[ad_1]


Self-driving cars are known for driving conservatively. After all, automakers and tech companies design autonomous vehicles to be textbook safe drivers, not aggressive speed demons. But mechanical engineers at Stanford University have been working on a research vehicle that can drive autonomously right at the edge of the tires’ grip on the surface below them, pushing the limits of friction.



The goal isn’t to create a self-driving car that can drift around a race track. Instead, the researchers want to help autonomous cars actually drive more safely by allowing them to know their own limits and even operate at the edge of those limits. It’s a useful skill for any driver to have if a deer dashes in front of the car—you want to be able to swerve if needed, but not so hard that the tires lose all purchase on the asphalt and the car skids off the road.



“Our lab is really interested in working on self-driving cars at the limits of handling,” says Nathan Speilberg, a doctoral candidate in the mechanical engineering department at Stanford University, and first author on a new paper in the journal Science Robotics on the topic. “We take a lot of inspiration from race drivers, because they’re able to skillfully use all of the available road friction to get around the track as fast as possible.”


To gather data for this project, the team used two test tracks: one was “near the Arctic Circle,” Spielberg says, which let them gather data (with both a human behind the wheel and in autonomous mode) about low-friction environments from a surface made out of ice and snow. Further south, Thunderhill Raceway Park in Willows, California, provided a place to get high-friction data.



They used this data to help train a neural network, which is a type of machine learning and artificial intelligence tool. Then they tested the vehicle on a oval-shaped course, giving the neural network control of the car’s steering angle.



Self-driving cars on the road today operate differently from the way this one was cruising. For one, autonomous vehicles on the streets use lidar and cameras to sense their environments, so they can react to something like a stop sign if they see it. This Stanford research vehicle, on the other hand, was using a highly accurate GPS system to know where it was, plus an onboard inertial navigation system. The researchers told it to drive around the oval, and gave it guidance on its speed, too: the vehicle goes about 46 miles per hour on the straight parts of the track, and around 25 mph on the curves. In other words, the researchers told the car what to do and how fast to go, and the neural network they’d trained was in charge of steering the car to its friction limits. They wanted the vehicle to “track the path as best as possible at the limits of the car’s capabilities,” Spielberg says. Check out the video:


So how did it do? They compared the car’s performance to a human driver on the track, who they told, Spielberg says, “to complete the course as fast as possible.” They found that the autonomous system was comparable to the human. They actually used both a neural-network based system and another more traditional physics-based system for the steering in autonomous mode, and discovered that the neural network gave a slight improvement. In short, putting AI partly behind the wheel helped its performance.



While it’s fun to watch an autonomous car screech around corners, Spielberg emphasizes the research is about safety and operating at the edge of the envelope if a situation demands it.



“We hope that we can make self-driving cars that are as good as the best skilled human drivers and hopefully better,” he says. That way, “if they get in a situation where they have to use all the road friction—if an obstacle pops out, or you suddenly encounter a patch of ice—that the car will know how to respond accordingly and safely.”




[ad_2]

Written By Rob Verger

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to avoid the mid-movie bathroom break

[ad_1] Long movies and the urge to pee have been linked since the early days of cinema. Sixty-three years before Avengers: Endgame and its three-hour runtime, moviegoers settled in for nearly four hours of The Ten Commandments . “There will be an intermission,” director Cecil B. DeMille announced during the movie’s introduction. And audiences’ bladders were relieved. On average, movies aren’t getting longer, but they also don’t come with a predetermined bathroom break. That means when nature calls, you’ve got to either sit in growing discomfort or gamble on the best time to run to the restroom. But it doesn’t have to be this way, and for most people, setting your body to “do not disturb” is fairly simple. Go before the show The first piece of advice is also the easiest: pee before the movie starts. Generally, healthy adults urinate every 3-4 hours, so the longer a movie runs, the more urgent it becomes to reset your internal p...
Post a Comment
Read more

Charted: Here's how much your food waste hurts the environment

[ad_1] Our species is pretty good at wasting food. Some we discard at the farm for being undersized or oddly shaped. Others we allow to decay in their shipping containers, thrown away before they even reach shelves. We leave even more foodstuffs wasting away in grocery stores, often by letting it sit there until it reaches its sell-by date. As consumers, we don’t have much control over most of the process that brings our food to the grocery store, but we do have control over how much food we personally waste. Let's face it: We’ve all found liquified lettuce in our veggie drawers. Don't fret. It's arguably impossible to consume 100 percent of the food we buy. But a healthy reminder of the effect food waste has on the environment might help us all to be more conscious of the amount of food we eat—and don't eat. Consumer food waste varies extensively depending on the area. In South and Southeast Asia, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that only around ...
Post a Comment
Read more