Skip to main content

Record cold temperatures don't mean the planet isn't warming

[ad_1]


A frigid blast of Arctic air is gushing over much of the Midwest this week, hammering many cities including Chicago, Minneapolis, Detroit, and Milwaukee. Temperatures will dip lower than they have for over two decades in some areas, down to -30 to -55 ºF with wind chill. In this cold, frostbite can happen in just five minutes.



Inevitably, some will be tempted to sneer at the reality of climate warming. But a bout of cold weather in a small part of the globe says little about long-term averages. Here’s why.



Why it’s cold this week



At the beginning of this year, the polar vortex—a swirling blob of cold air that sits high above the Arctic land surface—split apart. A lobe of cold air from the separated vortex is now touching down over the Great Lakes.



“Like a rock in a stream—in this case, the jet stream—[the polar vortex lobe] helped keep the jet stream pushed southward, which encourages cold air to be transported from Canada and the Arctic into mid-latitudes,” says Amy Butler, an atmospheric scientist at the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, adding that in addition to the polar vortex split, “a number of ingredients” came together to create these dangerously cold conditions.



Putting the cold in context



We’ll soon be back to what’s actually been a warm winter. “[The cold weather] will quickly depart it looks like by early next week—most of the eastern U.S. will be back to above average,” says Bob Henson, meteorologist with Weather Underground, part of IBM. “We may not have thought of it as a warm winter, but for most of December and January temperatures have been above average.”



There will always be random cold spells. Weather is variable and chaotic, influenced by many forces other than global average temperatures. “The weather frequently changes from day-to-day or even hour-to-hour, while changes in our climate occur in the long-term, such as over 30 year periods,” says Zachary Labe, a climate scientist at the University of California, Irvine. “Therefore, we cannot say that one cold outbreak or weather event is evidence for or against climate change.”



Though people tend to selectively remember extreme weather such as the current cold blast, the reality is that winters have been warming. International Falls, Minnesota logging a new record low of -45ºF on Sunday might seem surprising, but record lows are recorded every day globally. In the past year, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recorded 11,404 daily record lows. But there were also nearly twice as many new record highs—21,907.



When it comes to climate change, it’s the long-term picture that matters. “That ratio [of record highs to lows] has been getting bigger over the past few decades,” says Henson. “Cold doesn’t go away, it’s just less frequent.”



Importantly, extrapolating an event that hits the U.S., which comprises only about two percent of the planet’s surface, doesn’t make sense in a global context, says Henson. “That’s why they call it global warming.”



“While record low temperatures are expected this week in the northern United States, record heat has been occurring this month across much of Australia,” adds Labe. “Weather changes quickly around the world, and one location is not representative of the whole globe.”



Cold weather in a warming planet



Warming ocean temperatures lead to more water evaporating and making its way into the atmosphere. This in turn, can lead to heavier rain and snow. The U.S. Global Change Research Program in the Fourth National Climate Assessment predicts heavy storms will become more common across the country—even in places where the total amount of rain is projected to decrease, like the Southwest. And although the overall amount of snow the U.S. gets will likely go down in coming years due to warmer temperatures, intense storms will likely continue. A recent study published in Geophysical Research Letters, for example, found that while weak snowstorms will decrease along the East Coast, powerful nor’easters will persist at about the same rate.



Globally, cold extremes will decline over the next century, says Labe. But the atmosphere may hold surprises for some areas. For example, some scientists have suggested that warming over Arctic might alter the jet stream and lead to more cold air blowing into the midlatitudes (But “there is definitely not a consensus about this idea,” says Butler.)



As the climate warms, “all the ingredients of weather will still be on the table,” says Henson. “They're just going to be arranged in a different way, and we're going to have more of some ingredients and less of others as we go forward in time.”




[ad_2]

Written By Ula Chrobak

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...

Humans flourished through a supervolcano eruption 74,000 years ago (so you can make it through Tuesday)

[ad_1] About 74,000 years ago, a large chunk of a Pacific island exploded. It sent ash and other debris around the world, including to the southern tip of Africa, where it would be found by a team of international scientists and entered as the latest data point in one of the hottest debates in paleoanthropology ( I know ): Did the Toba supervolcano thrust our planet into a 1,000-year volcanic winter, thus bottle-necking animals and plants alike? Or was it just a little blip on our historic radar? That’s the contentious arena into which our intrepid researchers venture, this time with a new study in Nature establishing that humans in modern-day South Africa not only survived, but flourished after the Toba eruption. Where once was (we think, maybe) a mountain, there is now a huge caldera with a lake inside, and an island inside that. Their evidence shows that debris from the explosion landed 9,000 kilometers (5592.3 miles) away, the farthest distance traveled ever recorded for the ...

These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too unethical to repeat—even on monkeys.

[ad_1] John Gluck’s excitement about studying parent-child separation quickly soured. He’d been thrilled to arrive at the University of Wisconsin at Madison in the late 1960s, his spot in the lab of renowned behavioral psychologist Harry Harlow secure. Harlow had cemented his legacy more than a decade earlier when his experiments showed the devastating effects of broken parent-child bonds in rhesus monkeys. As a graduate student researcher, Gluck would use Harlow’s monkey colony to study the impact of such disruption on intellectual ability. Gluck found academic success, and stayed in touch with Harlow long after graduation. His mentor even sent Gluck monkeys to use in his own laboratory. But in the three years Gluck spent with Harlow—and the subsequent three decades he spent as a leading animal researcher in his own right—his concern for the well-being of his former test subjects overshadowed his enthusiasm for animal research. Separating parent and child,...