Skip to main content

Weedkiller weakens bees by messing with their microbiomes

[ad_1]


For more than a decade, millions of bees around the world have been dying mysteriously. This week, scientists may have found another clue as to why—linking the popular weed-killer Roundup to problems in the microbiome of honey bees.



Previous research has linked the plight of the bees to common pesticides, pests and pathogens, and global climate change. Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, could contribute by messing with the balance of healthy bacteria in bee guts and making them more susceptible to disease, according to a new study published this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.



“There are many factors causing death in beehives related to colony collapse disorder, and we want to know what’s really causing that,” says Erick Motta, a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin and one of the authors of the new study.



Glyphosate doesn’t actually kill bees outright. Roundup is an herbicide rather than a pesticide, which means it is specifically formulated to kill plants, not animals or insects. It’s primarily used to kill weeds and other unwanted greenery in gardens, yards, and agricultural fields—many genetically modified crops (GM-crops) are engineered to withstand showers of glyphosate and other agrochemicals, allowing farmers to apply Roundup more liberally. The product works by halting activity in a particular enzyme that exists in all plants and some microorganisms.



But just like humans, bees have a community of bacteria living in their digestive tract, called a microbiome. Some of those microorganisms contain the same enzyme glyphosate targets.



To look at the bee microbiome on Roundup, Motta took 2,000 honey bees from hives at the University of Texas campus and fed them either a low dose of glyphosate, a high dose, or a glyphosate-free syrup. Both glyphosate dosages approximated amounts commonly sprayed on yards, agricultural fields, and roadsides. Motta then released the bees and sampled 15 from each group before and after three days back in the hive.



In the sampled bees, some gut bacteria, like Gilliamella apicola, actually increased in number. Others, like Snodgrassella alvi, decreased. The overall bacterial count decreased for both exposed groups of bees, but the change was only statistically significant for the group exposed to the lower dose. Motta’s not sure why, but one possibility is that his sampling method didn’t account for bees that died or abandoned the hive. Previous research has shown glyphosate can disrupt bees’ navigational abilities, so it’s possible that more bees on the high dose never actually made it home for testing.



Glyphosate seemed to affect Snodgrassella alvi, a dominant bacterium in the gut of honey and bumble bees, more than other microorganisms. This bacterium helps regulate immune response, says Motta. While researchers aren’t sure exactly how the microbe does this, but it’s possible that a biofilm the species creates inside the bee’s small intestine physically blocks pathogens.



Next, the scientists wanted to see if this bacterial change had any impact on the bees’ immune response. This time, Motta took young worker bees that had not yet developed a normal bacterial community in their guts. He fed one group glyphosate, then exposed all the bees to a pathogen that opportunistically preys on their kind.



After a week, more of the bees exposed to both glyphosate and the pathogen died than those exposed to just the pathogen. “Bees with a normal microbial community were able to deal better” with the disease, says Motta.



“This might explain, at least in part, why the bee colonies of countries that allow GM-crops are weaker and weaker and with lower probabilities to survival at the end of the season,” wrote Walter Farina in an email to Popular Science. Farina is a biological scientist who studies bee communication at the University of Buenos Aires and was not involved in the UT Austin study.



Monsanto, the company that manufactures and sells Roundup (and genetically modified seeds designed to resist its effects), maintains their research has found no evidence of glyphosate harming bees. In an email statement to Popular Science, the company stated: “Claims that glyphosate has a negative impact on honey bees are simply not true. More than 40 years of robust, independent scientific evidence shows that it poses no unreasonable risk for humans, animal, and the environment generally.”



The bee microbiome is an emerging area of study, says Amro Zayed, a biologist who focuses on bees and genomics at York University, who was not involved in the new research. “The authors eloquently show that [glyphosate] doesn’t directly affect the bees biology,” he says, “but it does affect this community of bacteria that live in the bees’ gut that digest nutrients and fight off infections.”




[ad_2]

Written By Jillian Mock

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...

How to avoid the mid-movie bathroom break

[ad_1] Long movies and the urge to pee have been linked since the early days of cinema. Sixty-three years before Avengers: Endgame and its three-hour runtime, moviegoers settled in for nearly four hours of The Ten Commandments . “There will be an intermission,” director Cecil B. DeMille announced during the movie’s introduction. And audiences’ bladders were relieved. On average, movies aren’t getting longer, but they also don’t come with a predetermined bathroom break. That means when nature calls, you’ve got to either sit in growing discomfort or gamble on the best time to run to the restroom. But it doesn’t have to be this way, and for most people, setting your body to “do not disturb” is fairly simple. Go before the show The first piece of advice is also the easiest: pee before the movie starts. Generally, healthy adults urinate every 3-4 hours, so the longer a movie runs, the more urgent it becomes to reset your internal p...

Charted: Here's how much your food waste hurts the environment

[ad_1] Our species is pretty good at wasting food. Some we discard at the farm for being undersized or oddly shaped. Others we allow to decay in their shipping containers, thrown away before they even reach shelves. We leave even more foodstuffs wasting away in grocery stores, often by letting it sit there until it reaches its sell-by date. As consumers, we don’t have much control over most of the process that brings our food to the grocery store, but we do have control over how much food we personally waste. Let's face it: We’ve all found liquified lettuce in our veggie drawers. Don't fret. It's arguably impossible to consume 100 percent of the food we buy. But a healthy reminder of the effect food waste has on the environment might help us all to be more conscious of the amount of food we eat—and don't eat. Consumer food waste varies extensively depending on the area. In South and Southeast Asia, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that only around ...