Skip to main content

A healthy reef is alive with music, but the chorus fades as the coral dies.

[ad_1]


Take it from me: there’s a lot of music under the sea. A healthy section of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, for instance, is full of it—damselfish hooting, clownfish chirping, shrimp clicking their claws. ”There’s this whole sort of orchestra of animals making noise,” says University of Exeter PhD candidate Tim Gordon. But when reefs get damaged, animals die and the orchestra stops playing. That silence makes it harder for young fish that have grown up in the open ocean to find a way back to their adult homes, further degrading the already-suffering reefs.



“A reef without fish is really a reef that’s in trouble,” says Gordon. The marine biologist is the lead author on a new paper, published Monday in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, that compared the sounds of coral reefs recorded in lagoons around Lizard Island in 2012 before several major climate change- related events to recordings taken in the same places and similar circumstances four years later. What they found was a 15 decibel drop in reef noise. With further experimentation, they showed that a quieter reef attracted no more juvenile fish than the open ocean did.



To do this study, Gordon and his colleagues took their two recordings of the reefs and played them over underwater loudspeakers on sites around Lizard Island, Australia, along with a control group of open ocean sounds. They found that fish larvae were eight percent less attracted to the reduced sounds of the damaged reefs, while 40 percent fewer juvenile fish chose to settle on those reefs.



“It surprised me how consistent the results were [and] how strong the results were,” says Dave Mellinger, a marine bioacoustics research at Oregon State University who wasn’t involved in the new study. Across the species of tropical fish studied, the settlement rate of fish was remarkably consistent, he says, which just provides “another piece of evidence that sound is really important in the ocean.”


How fish find their way back to the reefs from the open ocean as juveniles is poorly understood, Mellinger says. This new study provides evidence that sound is a key part of that process. When there, fish play vital roles in reef ecosystems, from their mutualistic relationships with other species like anemones to their role as “cleaners” of damaged reef. Some species of reef fish eat the algae that grows on dead reef, allowing new polyps to help it regenerate. But, as this new paper demonstrates, when reefs fall silent, juvenile fish don’t make their homes there, preventing the reefs from making at least some comeback.



Three dramatic events affected the northern parts of the Great Barrier Reef between 2012 and 2016: Cyclone Ita, Cyclone Nathan and, in 2016, a mass bleaching event that hit the whole Great Barrier Reef. This study shows that the effects of these events have far-reaching consequences for potential reef recovery. The quieter and less complex reef sounds get, the less possibility that fish will return to help reefs recover.



The grim fate of Earth’s coral reefs has been in the news for some time now—with related factors like changing weather and ocean acidification killing off miles of reef, they don’t need any more bad news. But Gordon says people shouldn’t despair, although for him personally, hearing the two recordings was “absolutely heartbreaking.” Reducing carbon emissions is the long-term solution for helping the reefs, he says. And other studies suggest it’s not too late to change their fate.




[ad_2]

Written By Kat Eschner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...

How to avoid the mid-movie bathroom break

[ad_1] Long movies and the urge to pee have been linked since the early days of cinema. Sixty-three years before Avengers: Endgame and its three-hour runtime, moviegoers settled in for nearly four hours of The Ten Commandments . “There will be an intermission,” director Cecil B. DeMille announced during the movie’s introduction. And audiences’ bladders were relieved. On average, movies aren’t getting longer, but they also don’t come with a predetermined bathroom break. That means when nature calls, you’ve got to either sit in growing discomfort or gamble on the best time to run to the restroom. But it doesn’t have to be this way, and for most people, setting your body to “do not disturb” is fairly simple. Go before the show The first piece of advice is also the easiest: pee before the movie starts. Generally, healthy adults urinate every 3-4 hours, so the longer a movie runs, the more urgent it becomes to reset your internal p...

Charted: Here's how much your food waste hurts the environment

[ad_1] Our species is pretty good at wasting food. Some we discard at the farm for being undersized or oddly shaped. Others we allow to decay in their shipping containers, thrown away before they even reach shelves. We leave even more foodstuffs wasting away in grocery stores, often by letting it sit there until it reaches its sell-by date. As consumers, we don’t have much control over most of the process that brings our food to the grocery store, but we do have control over how much food we personally waste. Let's face it: We’ve all found liquified lettuce in our veggie drawers. Don't fret. It's arguably impossible to consume 100 percent of the food we buy. But a healthy reminder of the effect food waste has on the environment might help us all to be more conscious of the amount of food we eat—and don't eat. Consumer food waste varies extensively depending on the area. In South and Southeast Asia, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that only around ...