Skip to main content

Google wants to use naked mole rats to conquer death

[ad_1]


Gompertzian Law is hard to spell, but pretty easy to understand: the older a mammal is, the more likely it is to die. That’s just a fact of life—except, apparently, for naked mole rats. A new study from Calico Labs, which has the moonshot goal of unlocking the secrets of aging, found that the bald rodents’ risk of death isn’t necessarily proportionate to its age.



The creepy, hairless critter (which was famously featured as an anthropomorphic, nacho-loving side kick in the cartoon Kim Possible) has an unusually long life span, and a host of characteristics that make it seem relatively invincible. Naked mole rats don’t appear to feel pain the way most mammals do, and only a few individuals out of the hundreds studied are known to have developed cancer. They can also hold their breath for 18 minutes at a time with no apparent side effects whatsoever.



Unfortunately, this doesn’t mean naked mole rats hold the key to immortality. “I hate to burst the bubble,” says Stan Braude, a professor of practice in the biology department at Washington University in St. Louis. Braude, who works with naked mole rats but wasn’t involved in the new study, says that while the animals are likely to die off young in the wild because of predators or other natural factors, the few critters who survive that vulnerable period tend to live a long time. That’s consistent with the longevity that the Calico study found in its lab population. The overall rate of survival in the lab was obviously much higher, however, since natural factors were removed.



But the survival rate and longevity isn’t unique to naked mole rats. Braude gives the example of a tortoise or an oak tree: in the wild, both organisms can have long lifespans, but only if the seedlings or baby tortoises make it past everything that’s trying to eat them. Mice, on the other hand, only live for about three years in the wild or in the lab. It doesn’t seem to matter whether or not they’re in a safe environment; they get old, and as they get older they’re more likely to die.


So why should we care about naked mole rats, as opposed to sea tortoises or 100 year-old giant clams? And why is Alphabet, the parent company of Google, pouring money into researching the rodent at Calico?



It mostly likely has to do with the animal’s telomeres, Braude says. Telomeres are like the cap on a new pen. They protect strands of DNA from damage or decay. But telomeres themselves get damaged over the lifecycle of a cell, as it makes copies of itself. Once the telomere is gone, cells can no longer create new tissue. This highly scientific, molecular process is more commonly known as aging, and it’s something that the billionaire founders of Google (and Amazon and PayPal) would like to put an end to.



“Naked mole rats appear to be able to protect their telomeres,” says Braude. “They can have many more cell cycles, and that’s a really cool trick.” Scientists still don’t know how or why naked mole rats’ cells have this ability, but it is likely the next step in further research.



It could be a result of evolution, Braude hypothesizes. Mice, for example, are always in constant danger, so their biological priority is to reproduce quickly and copiously. That doesn’t leave a lot of room for natural selection to work its magic and select traits that would help them live longer.



Naked mole rats, on the other hand, are relatively safe in the wild once they’ve established a burrowed colony. Predators can’t easily slither into their labyrinthine underground homes, and the mole rats mostly feast on roots and tubers, meaning they hardly ever have to leave the house. The queen mole rat, much like a queen bee, is guarded by a plethora of worker rats. Evolutionarily speaking, that means traits related to longevity could be selected for over traits that allow fast reproduction. “There’s something special about mole rats,” says Braude. “But you want to make sure you get right what’s special, or you’re not going to be looking in the right places for further relevant, cool biology.”




[ad_2]

Written By Amal Ahmed

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...

Humans flourished through a supervolcano eruption 74,000 years ago (so you can make it through Tuesday)

[ad_1] About 74,000 years ago, a large chunk of a Pacific island exploded. It sent ash and other debris around the world, including to the southern tip of Africa, where it would be found by a team of international scientists and entered as the latest data point in one of the hottest debates in paleoanthropology ( I know ): Did the Toba supervolcano thrust our planet into a 1,000-year volcanic winter, thus bottle-necking animals and plants alike? Or was it just a little blip on our historic radar? That’s the contentious arena into which our intrepid researchers venture, this time with a new study in Nature establishing that humans in modern-day South Africa not only survived, but flourished after the Toba eruption. Where once was (we think, maybe) a mountain, there is now a huge caldera with a lake inside, and an island inside that. Their evidence shows that debris from the explosion landed 9,000 kilometers (5592.3 miles) away, the farthest distance traveled ever recorded for the ...

These 1950s experiments showed us the trauma of parent-child separation. Now experts say they're too unethical to repeat—even on monkeys.

[ad_1] John Gluck’s excitement about studying parent-child separation quickly soured. He’d been thrilled to arrive at the University of Wisconsin at Madison in the late 1960s, his spot in the lab of renowned behavioral psychologist Harry Harlow secure. Harlow had cemented his legacy more than a decade earlier when his experiments showed the devastating effects of broken parent-child bonds in rhesus monkeys. As a graduate student researcher, Gluck would use Harlow’s monkey colony to study the impact of such disruption on intellectual ability. Gluck found academic success, and stayed in touch with Harlow long after graduation. His mentor even sent Gluck monkeys to use in his own laboratory. But in the three years Gluck spent with Harlow—and the subsequent three decades he spent as a leading animal researcher in his own right—his concern for the well-being of his former test subjects overshadowed his enthusiasm for animal research. Separating parent and child,...