Skip to main content

Five questions about NASA's plans to visit an alien world in 2069

[ad_1]


Earlier this month, New Scientist reported that NASA has plans in the works to visit Alpha Centauri. While the plan is reportedly “nebulous,” the space agency hopes to launch something by 2069. Here’s what we know:



First things first: Why 2069?



The proposed launch date may seem an odd (if rather giggle-worthy) choice. But NASA didn’t just pull this one out of their butts: While setting the agency’s budget back in 2016, Representative John Culberson of Texas called for NASA to send a mission to Alpha Centauri by 2069. He didn’t pull that date out of his butt, either; It’s an homage to the centennial anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. Nice.



If you feel like you’ve been seeing the number 69 all over your space news as of late, you’re right! New Horizons—the probe that flew past Pluto and is currently delving into the outermost regions of our fair solar system—has a 2019 encounter planned with a mysterious object dubbed MU69. You can find out more about how it wound up with that moniker here. For some reason, NASA is currently on the prowl for a good nickname for the celestial body.


What’s Alpha Centauri and why would we go there?



What with all the far-flung exoplanets scientists keep discovering using various telescopes, it’s easy to forget that we’ve only physically explored a very tiny corner of our galaxy. Voyager 1 only recently made it past the boundaries of our solar system. We literally just saw the first documented extrasolar hunk of space rock come careening through our neighborhood.



The sad truth is that outside of our solar system, we don’t exactly have any close neighbors. The closest star system is Alpha Centauri, and it’s more than four light-years away. Alpha Centauri A and B are two stars twirling as a binary pair, but their third sibling—Proxima Centauri—is the closest. It’s actually pretty far from the other two (about 13,000-times the distance between Earth and the sun), so a “mission to Alpha Centauri” would probably just be a mission to Proxima Centauri.



Getting to the next solar system over is admittedly a pretty logical step in the whole space exploration thing. We got our feet all over the moon (and may do so again, if the President has anything to do with it), we’ve taken pretty pictures of all eight planets (and then some), and we’re planning probes to test the waters on potentially habitable ice moons. Shouldn’t we get some of our hardware out of the kiddie pool and into interstellar space?



Proxima Centauri carries the added benefit of at least one confirmed exoplanet, which may be rocky (read: vaguely Earth-like). It’s possible we could find life there, or at least learn something about how easy it is for life to evolve.



Will there be aliens?



Generally, if a planet has a rocky surface and liquid water, we consider it potentially habitable. We’ve only got one example of life to work with, and we know that water is pretty dang important to everything alive on Earth.



Because Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf star, its habitable zone—the range a planet can orbit in while maintaining liquid water—is much smaller than our own star’s. But it seems like at least one potentially rocky little planet is in that area. We still don’t know much about the planets and/or moons there, so it’s really too soon to say what we may or may not find. One would hope that we’ll know a little bit more by 2069. A private project called Project Blue intends to launch a space telescope capable of imaging the system by 2019.



How long would it take to get there?



That’s the tricky bit. Using our current technology, it would take a very, very long time. The New Horizons spacecraft travels at over 36,000 miles per hour, and that’s pretty much the bee’s knees in terms of speedy cosmic travel. But it would take a spacecraft like New Horizons around 78,000 years to reach Alpha Centauri. I’m all for planning ahead, but if we haven’t gotten people into interstellar space in 78,000 years, I’m quitting. Whether we invent warp drives or go extinct, such a spacecraft would surely become obsolete before reaching its destination.



NASA’s job is to find a faster way. That 2016 directive to shoot for the stars also specified that the agency should create a spacecraft for the job capable of traveling at 10 percent the speed of light. That would get us there in around 44 years.



Can we actually do that?



Maaaaaaaaaybe. There’s no reason to think it definitely can’t be done. The good folks at NASA aren’t even the only ones trying: A few years back, billionaire Yuri Milner launched an an initiative called Breakthrough Starshot to create a Centauri-bound probe. Starshot wants to create a light-propelled nanocraft—just a few grams of ship, shot into space with a giant laser pushing at its solar sails. In theory, this is possible. But we’ve got a long way to go.



NASA is supposed to work on this and other potential propulsion methods, none of which are anywhere near ready for primetime. In fact, none of them are above Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 1 or 2. That means we just know the basic principles that could make the propulsion systems work, or perhaps have some broad sketches of how we would harness those principles. A successful mission is TRL 9.



In other words, don’t hold your breath. But hey, 52 years is a long time. Maybe in 2113, humans will be eagerly awaiting confirmation of our first exoplanet probe’s arrival. Of course, it’ll take over four years for that signal to get back to us.




[ad_2]

Written By Rachel Feltman

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to avoid the mid-movie bathroom break

[ad_1] Long movies and the urge to pee have been linked since the early days of cinema. Sixty-three years before Avengers: Endgame and its three-hour runtime, moviegoers settled in for nearly four hours of The Ten Commandments . “There will be an intermission,” director Cecil B. DeMille announced during the movie’s introduction. And audiences’ bladders were relieved. On average, movies aren’t getting longer, but they also don’t come with a predetermined bathroom break. That means when nature calls, you’ve got to either sit in growing discomfort or gamble on the best time to run to the restroom. But it doesn’t have to be this way, and for most people, setting your body to “do not disturb” is fairly simple. Go before the show The first piece of advice is also the easiest: pee before the movie starts. Generally, healthy adults urinate every 3-4 hours, so the longer a movie runs, the more urgent it becomes to reset your internal p...
Post a Comment
Read more

Charted: Here's how much your food waste hurts the environment

[ad_1] Our species is pretty good at wasting food. Some we discard at the farm for being undersized or oddly shaped. Others we allow to decay in their shipping containers, thrown away before they even reach shelves. We leave even more foodstuffs wasting away in grocery stores, often by letting it sit there until it reaches its sell-by date. As consumers, we don’t have much control over most of the process that brings our food to the grocery store, but we do have control over how much food we personally waste. Let's face it: We’ve all found liquified lettuce in our veggie drawers. Don't fret. It's arguably impossible to consume 100 percent of the food we buy. But a healthy reminder of the effect food waste has on the environment might help us all to be more conscious of the amount of food we eat—and don't eat. Consumer food waste varies extensively depending on the area. In South and Southeast Asia, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that only around ...
Post a Comment
Read more