Skip to main content

Even with higher economic confidence, employers are reining in holiday bonuses: Poll

[ad_1]


Stronger corporate profits and increased economic confidence among employers may not translate to an end-of-year cash bonus for workers.





Thirty-nine percent of companies will be awarding a cash bonus this year, according to a new survey from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The new numbers, based on a survey of about 150 human resources executives in October and November, fell from 41 percent who said their companies would award a companywide or performance-based cash bonus last year.



Worse for employees is that 35 percent of respondents said their companies will be offering no year-end award at all. That's 5 percentage points higher than the 2016 figure of 30 percent.




"These results are surprising, given the tight labor market," the firm said in a press release. "Year-end bonuses are a reliable way to attract and retain talent."



Among the remaining pool of employees who can look forward to a year-end bonus, only a small fraction will see a heftier check this year than they did in 2016. Eight percent of employers plan to increase the bonus amount from the prior year, down from 18 percent who reported an increase in the 2016 survey.



Even as 87 percent of employers say that the economy is better or the same as it was last year, 80 percent plan to give the same amount in holiday bonuses that they did in 2016.



The U.S. unemployment rate fell to 4.1 percent in October, and the broader measure that includes discouraged workers dropped sharply to 7.9 percent. The data suggest that Americans are finding more opportunities in the economy, which would normally make employers more competitive to hold on to their workers.



"Employee recognition is becoming increasingly important if companies want to keep their workers," Challenger said.





[ad_2]

Share & Written By CNBC

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ice technicians are the secret stars of the Winter Olympics

[ad_1] The emphasis of this year's two-week-long Winter Olympic Games has been placed squarely on the Olympians themselves. After all, the stated purpose of the international competition is to bring together the world’s greatest athletes in a nail-biting competition across fifteen different winter sports. But before the curlers, skiers, and skaters even arrived in Pyeongchang, South Korea, the Olympians of the ice technician world were already a few weeks deep in a competition of their own. Mark Callan of the World Curling Federation and Markus Aschauer of the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation both say they’re hoping to make the best ice the Winter Olympics have ever seen. To transform the barren concrete jungle of existing tracks and arenas into an ice- and snow-covered wonderland is an enormous undertaking. And it takes a keen understanding of the physics and chemistry that keeps frozen precipitation pristine. Curling Callan has been making and maintaining ic...

With Operation Popeye, the U.S. government made weather an instrument of war

[ad_1] It was a seasonably chilly afternoon in 1974 when Senators Claiborne Pell, a Democrat from Rhode Island, and Clifford Case, a Republican from New Jersey, strode into the chambers of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for a classified briefing. While the meeting was labeled “top secret,” the topic at hand was rather mundane: They were there to discuss the weather. More specifically, Pell, the chairman of the now-defunct subcommittee for Oceans and International Environment, and his colleague were about to learn the true extent of a secret five-year-old cloud seeding operation meant to lengthen the monsoon season in Vietnam, destabilize the enemy, and allow the United States to win the war. Though it cycled through several names in its history, "Operation Popeye" stuck. Its stated objectives—to ensure Americans won the Vietnam War—were never realized, the revelation that the U.S. government played God with weather-altering warfare changed history. The...

University supercomputers are science's unsung heroes, and Texas will get the fastest yet

[ad_1] Supercomputers are powerful machines with great names—Blue Waters, Bridges, Jetstream, Comet. But a new one will soon be joining that list: Frontera. The $60 million machine will live at the University of Texas at Austin and is scheduled to come online next year. “It will be the fastest machine ever deployed at a university in the US,” says Dan Stanzione, the executive director of the Texas Advanced Computing Center. With supercomputers, the title of fastest is a moving target—what’s perhaps more important is not the exact ranking, but that they’re available for researchers to use in the first place. Right now, the fastest supercomputer in the world is called Summit, and it’s at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, part of the Department of Energy (DOE), and is specifically tailored for AI. But supercomputers located not at government labs but at universities—like Frontera and its ilk—play a crucial role in the ever...